Elabscience conducted comparison studies between their Flow Cytometry antibodies and antibodies from BioLegend and BD Biosciences. The below data shows comparable quality between each manufacturer.
Elabscience vs BioLegend
Fig.1. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies[GK1.5] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097E) and BioLegend, using both 0.25T and 1T for each brand.Fig.2. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with PerCP-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies [GK1.5] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097F) and BioLegend, using both 0.25T and 1T for each brand.Fig.3. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies [GK1.5] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097D) and BioLegend, using both 0.25T and 1T for each brand.Fig.4. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with PE/Cyanine7-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies [GK1.5] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097H) and BioLegend, using both 0.25T and 1T for each brand.Fig.5. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies [GK1.5] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097J) and BioLegend, using both 0.25T and 1T concentrations for each brand.Fig.6. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD90.2/Thy1.2 antibodies [30H12] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1094E) and BioLegend, using 1T concentrations for each brand.Fig.7. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies [GK1.5] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097C) and BioLegend, using 1T concentrations for each brand.Fig.8. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with Elab Fluor® 488-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1097L) and BioLegend, using 1T concentrations for each brand.Fig.9. C57BL/6 murine splenocytes were stained with APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD62L antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1011E) and BioLegend, using 1T concentrations for each brand.Fig.10. C57BL/6 murine platelets were stained with APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD41 antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1183E) and BioLegend, using 1T concentrations for each brand.Fig.11. Rat splenocytes were stained with PE-conjugated anti-rat CD8a antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1098D) and BioLegend, using 1T concentrations for each brand.
Elabscience vs BD Biosciences
Fig.12. Normal human peripheral blood cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD4 antibodies [RPA-T4] from Elabscience (E-AB-F1109D) and BD, using 1T concentrations for each brand. Cells in the lymphocytes gate were used for analysis.Fig.13. Normal human peripheral blood cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD8a antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1110D) and BD, using 1T concentrations for each brand. Cells in the lymphocytes gate were used for analysis.Fig.14. Normal human peripheral blood cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD56/NCAM antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1305D) and BD, using 1T concentrations for each brand. Cells in the lymphocytes gate were used for analysis.Fig.15. Normal human peripheral blood cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD4 antibodies from Elabscience (E-AB-F1352D) and BD, using 1T concentrations for each brand. Cells in the lymphocytes gate were used for analysis. Comparison of PE Anti Human CD4 Antibody and BD products from different batches.
